{"id":160,"date":"2011-06-17T21:12:30","date_gmt":"2011-06-18T01:12:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cstuart.ca\/?p=160"},"modified":"2011-10-21T11:35:15","modified_gmt":"2011-10-21T15:35:15","slug":"160","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/?p=160","title":{"rendered":"Alternatives to the Tar Sands"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Read the entry below from wikipedia and weep. Our lack of political will astounds me. There really is nothing preventing us from moving forward with this, (and other things like concentrating solar energy with storage), except shareholders marriage to profits from fossil fuel companies, to nuclear fetishism, to weapons, and to market worship enshrined in intellectually shrivelled subservient governments.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">EGS &#8211; Enhanced Geothermal Sytems<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">A 2006 report by MIT,[34] and funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, conducted the most comprehensive analysis to date on the potential and technical status of EGS. The 18-member panel, chaired by Professor Jefferson Tester of MIT, reached several significant conclusions:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">1. Resource Size: The report calculated the United States total EGS resources from 3\u201310 km of depth to be over 13,000 zettajoules, of which over 200 ZJ would be extractable, with the potential to increase this to over 2,000 ZJ with technology improvements \u2014 sufficient to provide all the world&#8217;s current energy needs for several millennia.[34] The report found that total geothermal resources, including hydrothermal and geo-pressured resources, to equal 14,000 ZJ \u2014 or roughly 140,000 times the total U.S. annual primary energy use in 2005.<br \/>\n2. Development Potential: With a modest R&amp;D investment of $1 billion over 15 years (or the cost of one coal power plant), the report estimated that 100 GWe (gigawatts of electricity) or more could be installed by 2050 in the United States. The report further found that the &#8220;recoverable&#8221; resource (that accessible with today&#8217;s technology) to be between 1.2\u201312.2 TW for the conservative and moderate recovery scenarios respectively.<br \/>\n3. Cost: The report found that EGS could be capable of producing electricity for as low as 3.9 cents\/kWh. EGS costs were found to be sensitive to four main factors: 1) Temperature of the resource, 2) Fluid flow through the system measured in liters\/second, 3) Drilling Costs, and 4) Power conversion efficiency.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/geothermal.inel.gov\/publications\/future_of_geothermal_energy.pdf\">http:\/\/geothermal.inel.gov\/publications\/future_of_geothermal_energy.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Read the entry below from wikipedia and weep. Our lack of political will astounds me. There really is nothing preventing us from moving forward with this, (and other things like concentrating solar energy with storage), except shareholders marriage to profits from fossil fuel companies, to nuclear fetishism, to weapons, and to market worship enshrined in&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/?p=160\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Alternatives to the Tar Sands<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment-climate-change","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s6uTkF-160","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=160"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":211,"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions\/211"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cstuart.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}